Potential Field Source Surface Model
Assuming that the coronal magnetic field is potential, if the
currents carried by the plasma is negligible, it can be computed
by solving the LaPlace's equation, using the observed photospheric
magnetic field and assuming all the field to be radial beyond
a distance of 2.5 Rsun as boundary
conditions. A coronal model of this kind is called Potential Field
Source Surface (PFSS) model and has been useful in predicting the
observed coronal structures, though discrepancies are significant.
The PFSS model was first put forth by Schatten
et al. (1969) and independently, by Altschuler
and Newkirk (1969). The model has a few free parameters: height of
source surface: 2.5 or 2.35sun, the radius
of the inner surface: 1.0 sun or slightly
different, the number of multipole components included in the
spherical harmonic expansion of fields, represented by
Nmax. These three parameters are sensitive factors
in computing the coronal features using the PFSS model, with
Nmax being the most sensitive one.
Poduval and Zhao (2004a)
computed the locations (&theta, &phi)
of the photospheric foot points of coronal sources of solar wind
observed near the Earth
mapped back
to the Sun, for different values of Nmax in the potential
field calculations, as evident in Thetafig and Phifig below.
Thetafigr:
Variation of heliographic latitude &theta, with
Nmax, of the foot points of open field lines
at selected locations on the source surface for
CR 1829. The vertical line corresponds to
Nmax = 22. Here,
tt(Nmax) - tt(Nmax = 9) on the Y-axis is the
difference in the computed values of &theta for different
Nmax from the reference value,
Nmax= 9. On top of each panel,
'wso' represents the Wilcox Solar Observatory, the input
photospheric magnetic field data and the numbers in
parenthesis represent the location of open field lines
(&theta, &phi) on source surface selected for the study.
In this figure, only those locations where
tt(Nmax) - tt(Nmax = 9) is larger than
± 2° were shown, hence the apparent randomness in
the source surface location.
Phifig: Same as Thetafig but for &phi . Here,
p(Nmax) - p(nmax = 9) represents the difference
in the computed values of &phi for different Nmax
from the reference value, Nmax= 9.
The deviations did not show any latitudinal
or longitudinal dependencies, instead, they were quite random
fluctuations without any systematic variation with Nmax
and are nearly constant for most locations above
Nmax = 22. From this study, we estimated
that the error or uncertainty in the photospheric foot points of a
feature on source surface when traced back along the magnetic field
lines can be as high as 60° in longitude and 20° in latitude.