Potential Field Source Surface Model

Assuming that the coronal magnetic field is potential, if the currents carried by the plasma is negligible, it can be computed by solving the LaPlace's equation, using the observed photospheric magnetic field and assuming all the field to be radial beyond a distance of 2.5 Rsun as boundary conditions. A coronal model of this kind is called Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) model and has been useful in predicting the observed coronal structures, though discrepancies are significant. The PFSS model was first put forth by Schatten et al. (1969) and independently, by Altschuler and Newkirk (1969). The model has a few free parameters: height of source surface: 2.5 or 2.35sun, the radius of the inner surface: 1.0 sun or slightly different, the number of multipole components included in the spherical harmonic expansion of fields, represented by Nmax. These three parameters are sensitive factors in computing the coronal features using the PFSS model, with Nmax being the most sensitive one. Poduval and Zhao (2004a) computed the locations (&theta, &phi) of the photospheric foot points of coronal sources of solar wind observed near the Earth mapped back to the Sun, for different values of Nmax in the potential field calculations, as evident in Thetafig and Phifig below.

Thetafig

Thetafigr: Variation of heliographic latitude &theta, with Nmax, of the foot points of open field lines at selected locations on the source surface for CR 1829. The vertical line corresponds to Nmax = 22. Here, tt(Nmax) - tt(Nmax = 9) on the Y-axis is the difference in the computed values of &theta for different Nmax from the reference value, Nmax= 9. On top of each panel, 'wso' represents the Wilcox Solar Observatory, the input photospheric magnetic field data and the numbers in parenthesis represent the location of open field lines (&theta, &phi) on source surface selected for the study. In this figure, only those locations where tt(Nmax) - tt(Nmax = 9) is larger than ± 2° were shown, hence the apparent randomness in the source surface location.

Phifig

Phifig: Same as Thetafig but for &phi . Here, p(Nmax) - p(nmax = 9) represents the difference in the computed values of &phi for different Nmax from the reference value, Nmax= 9.

The deviations did not show any latitudinal or longitudinal dependencies, instead, they were quite random fluctuations without any systematic variation with Nmax and are nearly constant for most locations above Nmax = 22. From this study, we estimated that the error or uncertainty in the photospheric foot points of a feature on source surface when traced back along the magnetic field lines can be as high as 60° in longitude and 20° in latitude.